In this lab you will be writing agents that use depth-bounded Minimax search with Alpha-Beta pruning to play Mancala and Breakthrough. In Mancala, players take turns grabbing all of the stones from one house on their side of the board and sowing them counterclockwise. The objective is to end the game with the most pieces in one's scoring house. In Breakthrough, players take turns advancing pawn-like pieces on a rectangular board. The objective is to get a single piece to the opponent's end of the board. The examples below show a mid-game board state from each game.
----------------------------------- | | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | | 13 |-----------------------| 14 | >| | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | |< ----------------------------------- --------- |· · · · ●| |· · ● · ●| |· ● ● ● ●| |● ● · · ·| |● · ● ● ●| |· · ● ● ·| |· · · · ●| ---------
The following Wikipedia pages have complete rulesets for each game. Note that Mancala has many, many variants, so if you have played it before, you might have used different rules.
As in the previous lab, use Teammaker to form your team. You can log in to that site to indicate your partner preference. Once you and your partner have specified each other and the lab has been released, a GitHub repository will be created for your team.
The objectives of this lab are to:
You will need to modify these files:
You should also look over the following files:
To see the available command-line options for game play try running:
./PlayGame.py -hThen try playing Breakthrough against a really terrible opponent by running:
./PlayGame.py breakthrough random human --showAnd try playing Mancala against your lab partner by running:
./PlayGame.py mancala human human --showTry playing several games (and refer to the Wikipedia links above) to make sure you understand the rules of each game.
Open the files Mancala.py and Breakthrough.py to review the methods that have been provided. Notice that both games represent the board as 2-dimensional array of integers, but otherwise have different internal semantics. In Breakthrough, blank spaces are 0s, the first player's pieces are +1s, and the second player's pieces are -1s. In Mancala, the non-scoring houses are represented by one array, and the scoring houses are represented by another. Both games provide several methods and attributes that you should make use of in your search:
Open the files BasicPlayers.py and MinMaxPlayers.py to see how we will be implementing game-playing agents. The HumanPlayer and RandomPlayer classes are provided to make your testing easier. All players must implement a getMove() method that takes a game instance representing the current state and returns one of the legal moves from that state.
In the file Heuristics.py, implement the basic static evaluation methods for both Mancala and Breakthrough.
Your static evaluators should:
The comments within each basic method explain how you should evaluate the boards. At the bottom of the file there is a testing section. Some test code has been provided for the Mancala basic static evaluator. Add your own test code for Breakthrough.
Once you are confident that your basic static evaluators are working you can move on to implementing the search itself. Save the better Breakthrough evaluator for later.
Next focus on the MinMaxPlayers.py file, and complete the following steps:
In the file MinMaxPlayers.py, implement the MinMaxPlayer.getMove() method which should run a helper method to conduct a bounded Minimax search (the pseudocode is given below). Minimax will return the best value found for the current player. However, we need to determine the move associated with the best value found. To do this, the Minimax search will update a class variable to represent the best move found. This move is what you will need to return from the getMove() method.
bounded_min_max(state, depth) if depth limit reached or state is terminal return staticEval(state) # init bestValue depending on who's turn it is bestValue = turn * -infinity for each move from state: determine the next_state # Recursive call value = bounded_min_max(next_state, depth+1) if player is maximizer if value > bestValue bestValue = value if depth is 0, update bestMove to current move else # player is minimizer if value < bestValue bestValue = value if depth is 0, update bestMove to current move return bestValue
Thoroughly test Minimax. During testing, add print statements during single games to track the values coming back from recursive calls. Remember that positive values are good for the maximizer and negative values are good for the minimizer.
Once you are confident that Minimax is working properly, remove the print statements and do more extensive tests using a series of games. Even with a depth limit of 1, your MinMaxPlayer should win the significant majority of games against a random player. In general, an agent with depth D should lose or at best tie against an agent with depth D+2.
You can set the depth using the -d1 and -d2 arguments (for player 1 and player 2 respectively). By default the depths are set to 4. The following command plays a game between two minmax agents where player 1 uses depth 2 and player 2 uses depth 4:
./PlayGame.py mancala minmax minmax -d1 2 -d2 4 --showYou can also have your agent play several games (alternating sides) and report the results:
./PlayGame.py mancala minmax random -d1 2 -games 10You should also try playing against it yourself!
./PlayGame.py mancala minmax human -d1 4 --show
./PlayGame.py mancala minmax pruning -games 2Note that these agents should be equally matched; pruning should just make decisions faster.
Come up with an improved static evaluator for the breakthrough game and implement it in the file Heuristics.py.
Your goal is to create an evaluator that will beat the basic evaluator function when tested using minimax players with equal depth limits.
Write a clear and thorough comment with your betterEval method to describe how it works. If you add helper functions, be sure to include comments describing these as well. You can tell your agent which static evaluator to use via the -e1 and -e2 command line options. The default is to use the basic evaluator. The following command plays 2 games with agents that both search to depth 3, but use different static evaluators:
./PlayGame.py -games 2 breakthrough minmax minmax -d1 3 -d2 3 -e1 better -e2 basic