Computing Curricula 2001

-- DRAFT (March 6, 2000) --


Bibliography

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. Accreditation policy and procedure manual. Technical report, November 1999.

  2. ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. An undergraduate program in computer science -- preliminary recommendations. Communications of the ACM, 8(9):543-552, September 1965.

  3. ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. Curriculum '68: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 11(3):151-197, March 1968.

  4. ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science. Curriculum '78: Recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 22(3):147-166, March 1979.

  5. ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 1992.

  6. ACM Two-Year College Education Committee. Guidelines for associate-degree and certificate programs to support computing in a networked environment. New York: The Association for Computing Machinery, September 1999.

  7. W. Bennett. A position paper on guidelines for electrical and computer engineering education. IEEE Transactions in Education, E-29(3):175-177, August 1986.

  8. John Beidler, Richard Austing, and Lillian Cassel. Compuing programs in small colleges. Communications of the ACM, 28(6):605-611, June 1985.

  9. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government. Enabling the future: Linking science and technology to societal goals. New York: Carnegie Commission, September 1992.

  10. Computing Science and Telecommunications Board. Realizing the information future. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994.

  11. Computing Science and Telecommunications Board. Being fluent with information technology. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

  12. Computing Sciences Accreditation Board. Criteria for accrediting programs in computer science in the United States. Technical report in preparation for June 2000, Version 1.0, January 2000. http://www.csab.org/criteria2k_v10.html.

  13. COSINE Committee. Computer science in electrical engineering. Washington, DC: Commission on Engineering Education, September 1967.

  14. Peter J. Denning, Douglas E. Comer, David Gries, Michael C. Mulder, Allen B. Tucker, A. Joe Turner, and Paul R. Young. Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1):9-23, January 1989.

  15. Peter J. Denning. Computing the profession. Educom Review, November 1998.

  16. Peter J. Denning. Our seed corn is growing in the commons. Information Impacts Magazine, March 1999. http://www.cisp.org/imp/march_99/denning/03_99denning.htm.

  17. Educational Activities Board. The 1983 model program in computer science and engineering. Technical Report 932, Computer Society of the IEEE, December 1983.

  18. Educational Activities Board. Design education in computer science and engineering. Technical Report 971, Computer Society of the IEEE, October 1986.

  19. Education Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. A curriculum in computer science and engineering. Publication EHO119-8, Computer Society of the IEEE, January 1977.

  20. Norman E. Gibbs and Allen B. Tucker. Model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 29(3):202-210, March 1986.

  21. John T. Gorgone, Paul Gray, David L. Feinstein, George M. Kasper, Jerry N. Luftman, Edward A. Stohr, Joseph S. Valacich, and Rolf T. Wigand. MSIS 2000: Model curriculum and guidelines for graduate degree programs in information systems. Association for Computing Machinery and Association for Information Systems, January 2000. http://cis.bentley.edu/ISA/pages/documents/msis2000jan00.pdf.

  22. Charles F. Kelemen (editor), Owen Astrachan, Doug Baldwin, Kim Bruce, Peter Henderson, Dale Skrien, Allen Tucker, and Charles Ban Loan. Computer Science Report to the CUPM Curriculum Foundations Workshop in Physics and Computer Science. Report from a workshop at Bowdoin College, October 28-31, 1999.

  23. Elliot P. Koffman, Philip L. Miller, and Caroline E. Wardle. Recommended curriculum for CS1: 1984 a report of the ACM curriculum task force for CS1. Communications of the ACM, 27(10):998-1001, October 1984.

  24. Elliot P. Koffman, David Stemple, and Caroline E. Wardle. Recommended curriculum for CS2, 1984: A report of the ACM curriculum task force for CS2. Communications of the ACM, 28(8):815-818, August 1985.

  25. Edward A. Lee and David G. Messerschmitt. Engineering and education for the future. IEEE Computer, 77-85, January 1998.

  26. Doris K. Lidtke, Gordon E. Stokes, Jimmie Haines, and Michael C. Mulder. ISCC '99: An information systems-centric curriculum '99, July 1999. http://www.iscc.unomaha.edu.

  27. C. Dianne Martin, Chuck Huff, Donald Gotterbarn, Keith Miller. Implementing a tenth strand in the CS curriculum. Communications of the ACM, 39(12):75-84, December 1996.

  28. Michael C. Mulder. Model curricula for four-year computer science and engineering programs: Bridging the tar pit. Computer, 8(12):28-33, December 1975.

  29. Michael C. Mulder and John Dalphin. Computer science program requirements and accreditation -- an interim report of the ACM/IEEE Computer Society joint task force. Communications of the ACM, 27(4):330-335, April 1984.

  30. Peter G. Neumann. Computer related risks. New York: ACM Press, 1995.

  31. Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., J. Daniel Couger, Gordon B. Davis. Information systems curriculum recommendations for the 80s: Undergraduate and graduate programs. Communications of the ACM, 25(11):781-805, November 1982.

  32. National Science Foundation Advisory Committee. Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington DC: National Science Foundation, 1996.

  33. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, November 1999.

  34. President's Science Advisory Commission. Computers in higher education. Washington DC: The White House, February 1967.

  35. Mary Shaw. The Carnegie-Mellon curriculum for undergraduate computer science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

  36. Mary Shaw and James E Tomayko. Models for undergraduate courses in software engineering. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, January 1991.

  37. Mary Shaw. We can teach software better. Computing Research News 4(4):2-12, September 1992.

  38. Software Engineering Coordinating Committee. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK). Stone Man Version 0.5. Joint project of the IEEE Computer Society and the Association for Computing Machinery. October 1999. http://www.swebok.org/stoneman/version05/.

  39. Allen B. Tucker, Bruce H. Barnes, Robert M. Aiken, Keith Barker, Kim B. Bruce, J. Thomas Cain, Susan E. Conry, Gerald L. Engel, Richard G. Epstein, Doris K. Lidtke, Michael C. Mulder, Jean B. Rogers, Eugene H. Spafford, and A. Joe Turner. Computing Curricula '91. Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1991.

  40. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Educating scientists and engineers: Grade school to grad school. OTA-SET-377. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1988.

  41. Henry M. Walker and G. Michael Schneider. A revised model curriculum for a liberal arts degree in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 39(12):85-95, December 1996.

  42. Lofti A. Zadeh. Computer science as a discipline. Journal of Engineering Education, 58(8):913-916, April 1968.
CC2001 Report
DRAFT -- March 6, 2000
This report is a working draft and does not carry
any endorsement from the sponsoring organizations